For many founders, an initial public offering (IPO) is more than a milestone, it’s the ultimate exit strategy. It represents validation, liquidity and the opportunity to monetise years of risk and sacrifice.
When founders start exploring an IPO, whether on Bursa Malaysia or US’s Nasdaq, most conversations revolve around exit pricing, valuation, timing and which investment bank to appoint. But the journey from a private start-up to a public company is not all just about timing the market or maximizing valuation. The path is paved with critical structural decisions, from share swaps to SPV incorporations that can make or break the IPO before a single share hits the exchange.
But in practice, the IPO process begins long before the prospectus is drafted. The most consequential work happens quietly in the background: Pre-IPO restructuring.
Share swaps. SPV incorporations. Capital table consolidation. Founder exits.
Done properly, these steps create a clean, investable, attractive and institution-ready structure.
Done poorly, these technicalities delay listings, trigger tax inefficiencies, and raise red flags in due diligence.
The truth is structural readiness often determines the success of execution. Here is what founders should get right.
1. Why is Pre-IPO Restructuring Required
Pre-IPO restructuring is hardly cosmetic. It serves strategic and legal objectives to facilitate a desirable and scalable group structure. Common objectives include:
- • a new holding company, local or offshore
- • Consolidating fragmented shareholdings or investments from prior funding rounds
- • Cleaning up nominee or informal shareholding arrangements
- • Ring-fencing operating liabilities, isolating the operating risk from the holding company level
- • Reorganising founder ownership ahead of exit
Capital markets participants prefer to invest in a clean top-level holding company, rather than a layered operating entity with historical complexity. Pre-IPO restructuring, done right, offers a simple structure with a goal to provide clarity, enforceability and governance.
Restructuring therefore goes beyond the form, it goes to investability.
2.Share Swaps: Straightforward in Theory, Risky in Practice
Once a new holding company is incorporated, founders typically undertake a share swap, involving the shareholders of the operating company transferring their shares to the newly incorporated holding company in exchange for shares in that holding company. This results in the holding company owning 100% of the operating entity and becomes the IPO vehicle.
While mechanically simple, the risks often lie in the details. This is where restructuring becomes very tangible in cost, risk and scrutiny.
i) Stamp Duty and Tax Exposure
In Malaysia, a transfer of shares in a Malaysian company is subject to stamp duty at 0.3% of the higher of:
- • the consideration paid, or
- • the net tangible asset (NTA) value of the shares
Even though no cash changes hands, the Inland Revenue will assess the value of the shares transferred based on the higher of consideration or NTA. This means that even if shares are transferred at nominal value as part of a restructuring, stamp duty may still be imposed based on the underlying asset value of the company.
For profitable operating companies or those with significant assets, the assessed value can be substantial. This is particularly relevant in pre-IPO scenarios, where valuations may already be trending upward. Unless the transaction qualifies for relief under the Stamp Act 1949, the duty cost can be material.
Under the Stamp Act 1949, relief may be available for a reconstruction or amalgamation, including certain pre-IPO share swaps, provided strict conditions are met. Broadly, these include:
- • the new holding company is newly incorporated within 6 months and has increased its share capital to view to acquiring the operating company;
- • the new holding company acquires at least 90% of shares in the operating company;
- • the constitution of the new holding company and the relevant approvals approving capital increase explicitly states the purpose is to acquire the operating company;
- • the consideration must consist of not less than 90% in shares issued by the new holding company (i.e. it must be substantially a share-for-share exchange); and
- • such relief is applied in a timely manner.
Timing matters here. If the restructuring is carried out early when the company is still valued lower, the lower the costs will inevitably be. But the same restructuring can become much more expensive once the company’s valuation increases, for example, after a pre-IPO placement or funding round.
ii) Minority Shareholder Considerations
When considering an IPO, founders must also examine whether the minority shareholders are on board. Even if one minority shareholder resists participation, this may lead to complications. Founders must examine the pre-emption rights, call options, transfer restrictions, shareholders’ rights, particularly, the drag-along provisions or any call options.
Rushing a restructuring without properly addressing minority protections creates the risk of minority oppressions during the exit.
iii) Swap Ratios and Fairness
Underwriters will also scrutinize whether the exchange ratio was fair and whether there are undocumented side arrangements.
What appears commercially agreed or consensual among founders may not withstand regulatory scrutiny. In a public listing context, governance is as important as legality.
3. Incorporation of SPVs
Special purpose vehicles (SPVs) are commonly incorporated to serve as the listing vehicle. However, the IPO vehicle must be structured with foresight. It must accommodate not just the listing, but future capital market activities.
The structure should allow flexibility for:
- • Pre-IPO placements
- • Employee share option plans
- • Institution investors
- • Convertible instruments
- • Secondary markets
Beyond fundraising flexibility, the SPV layer also serves to keep operational liabilities separated from the SPV, reset governance at the SPV level, facilitate future acquisitions and most importantly, to align board composition with public company expectations.
The Strategic Perspective
Pre-IPO restructuring is not merely a compliance or a ‘cleaning-up’ exercise. It influences valuation, founder control, regulatory approval and investor confidence.
Founders who treat restructuring as a strategic capital markets preparation phase position themselves for smoother execution and stronger investor reception. Those who defer often find themselves restructuring under time pressure and time pressure rarely produces optimal structures.
About the authors
Laurel Lim Mei Ying
Senior Associate
Capital Markets, Corporate and M&A,
Commercial and Regulatory Compliance
Halim Hong & Quek
laurel.lim@hhq.com.my
◦
Zoe Lim Zi Yi
Pupil-in-Chambers
Corporate & Capital Markets
Halim Hong & Quek
zoe.lim@hhq.com.my
More of our articles that you should read:
